The main visitors to museums and historical sites are tourists, not local people
Why is it the case? What can be done to attract local people to these places?
Một số bài làm tham khảo:
Tourists are generally drawn to museums and historical locations when visiting new countries. However, records have shown local people’s low attendance at these attractions. Some explanations will be put forward before solutions can be drawn to tackle this problem.
There are several reasons as to why tourists, instead of the local people, come to museums and historical places. First, these locations can provide visitors with a comprehensive overview of the traditions in the particular locality they are situated. As a result, such destinations are generally more appealing to the newcomers than to the locals, those without the need to familiarise themselves with the traditional values of the region. Moreover, because the layout of museums and historical houses is likely to remain unchanged through years, they can be visually unattractive to the local inhabitants, who may have been to these sites for at least once in their younger years.
Several measures can be prompted to promote locals’ attendance rate at buildings for historic relics and museums. The main solution is to change the public’s perception of such places as sites for only monotonous activities. Should civic events including weddings, anniversaries and concerts be allowed to be held in these locations, they would attract substantial public attention to historical values. Another resolution is that historians and preservationists should be featured more frequently on the media, with their articles on the tremendous worth of museums and historical remains.
To conclude, historical areas and museums can be uninteresting for local citizens because they can be too familiar with the culture that these places depict. To better this, there should be more media coverage on historical assets, and also more open-door policies to use such locations as spots for more public-oriented activities.
Many tourism destinations are well-known for their wonderful museums and historical sites which appeal thousand and thousand tourists every year. Ironally, these attractions are ignored by local residents. This essay will discuss the reasons and the possible solutions to this issue.
To begin with, the familiarity is major factor which makes local people out of curiosity and have no desire to visit these places. It is such sense which causes the boredom to the people who live near these historistic sites. Many people who live in my neighborhood admit that they have never gone to see the citadel which was recognized by UNESCO for World Cultual Heritage some years ago since they know by heart what are inside the citadel and the stories around it from members in family even without visiting them. Besides that, the serious degradation of the museums and historical sites explains the decreasing in number of local visitors. Surely, there will be nobody who wants to see the ugly, broken attractions.
There are some measures which can be taken to call the attention of local people and encourage them to go to historistic sites in their spare time. Firstly, history experts can be invited to rearrange the items in the museums and historical sites so that they have fresh appearance but do not lose the pro-long existed spirit. Secondly, the visits to the historistic sites should be integrated in local history classes as an outdoor activity which will help learners feel very relaxing when they are there. Lastly, government should spend the amount of State’s budget on recovering the damaged historic sites so that they can remain their values of architectural and historical beauties.
In conclusion, people turn their back against museums and historical sites in their residence for some reasons and I believe that these can be solved with the measures I mentioned above
At present, a phenomenon taking place widely in many countries is the main visitors who participate in museums and historical regions are tourists, not local people. Having several dominant causes is pointed out to explain this issue and some auspicious resolutions should be implemented to tackle it.
There are multiple reasons can be shown to interpret this occurrence. A large number of people always believed that historical events exhibited in museums which they were taught in schools many times. Thereby, they do not need to visit such historical relics any more. Another opportune explanation supporting this statement is that the arrangement of exhibits is not alluring inhabitants because pictures are confusedly placed without any profoundly guiding information and exciting. Besides, historical sites are public areas where crowd a plenty of travelers must line up for a long time to only watch some historic artifacts that is not worthwhile. As a result, many local residents can be uninteresting to come by those places.
Several feasible measurements should be taken into account to address this situation. From government’s perspective, its relevant agencies carefully consider to attach some real visitations relating to historic lessons to encourage their schoolchildren more caring about local history. In addition, authorities should provide free-entrance for inhabitants who would like to research and learn their regional history. From archives’ perspective, its administration should organize regular exhibitions and create a friendly environment with the combination between outdoor activities and historical knowledge which local citizens do not feel humdrum while visiting museums.
To conclude, historical areas and museums cannot be gorgeous regional citizens because these demonstrate things they had already known and time-consuming while waiting their turn to enter such locations. To improve it, there should be more attempts from competent agencies should enact more favorable policies to promote local’s attendance figure.